| 
Documents relating to Biodiversity
in England are available here as downloadable
html, or as PDF files which require
a free Acrobat reader. Others have
been archived to minimise download
times and may be unzipped using WinZip.

Other documents have to be purchased
and the details are available including
ISBN codes and addresses to write
to.

Refreshing the Biodiversity Partnership in England - Notes of a workshop held on 1 March 2007
This is a note of a workshop chaired by Barry Gardiner, Minister for Biodiversity, Landscape and Rural Affairs on 1 March 2007 with the objectives of (1) exploring the ecosystem approach as the guiding principle for future action planning, to help place site and species conservation in a more dynamic context to meet challenges including climate change and (2) streamlining the bureaucracy surrounding the BAP in England.

Wildlife Attraction: Visitor Expenditure Model
Attractions designed to protect our wildlife and enable people to learn about and enjoy UK biodiversity, are increasingly being asked to estimate the contribution that they are making to their local communities. The difficulty, however, is that in order to justify public sector support and/or protection from alternative land uses, this contribution is often required to be expressed in monetary terms. The most tangible monetary activity stimulated by wildlife is its role in encouraging visitors – both holidaymakers and day-trippers – into a locality to spend time and money. The extent to which a wildlife attraction can claim to have stimulated visitor expenditure in a locality depends on the type(s) of visitor and the characteristics of the attraction. Moreover, the extent to which this expenditure then remains within, and circulates around, a local economy depends on the characteristics of the local economy in question. Estimating the economic impact of visitors can be a costly exercise, involving extensive visitor surveys and trained economic expertise.
The 'Wildlife
Attraction: Visitor Expenditure Model' however provides a tool for
estimating the economic impact generated by tourists visiting a given attraction.
It is not a substitute for the detailed survey work and economic analysis
described above, but does provide a starting point or benchmark for estimating
the impact of visitors to wildlife attractions.
A User Guide explains the principles of the model and how it should be used. It also provides guidance for improving the robustness of information fed into the model, through, for example effective design of visitor surveys and interpretation of the subsequent results. A further paper sets out the core
assumptions that underpin the model.
The economic impacts that the model seeks to estimate are only one of the many benefits that wildlife sites bring to both residents and the population of the UK. Sites also provide protection for certain species, a basis for learning and education, support social groups and are a source of enjoyment for visitors. It is important that the significance of these roles is also given consideration, and that the economic impacts are not seen as the only measure of benefit. The model is intended to assist in calculating the net difference that the sites make specifically to visitor expenditure.
Disclaimer
This model provides a tool for estimating the economic impact generated by tourists visiting a given wildlife attraction. It is not a substitute for detailed survey work and economic analysis. None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators, or anyone else connected with this model can be responsible for, or credited with, the information and results generated by the model.
Wildlife
Attraction: Visitor Expenditure Model Format: Microsoft Excel Availability: Free Download User Guide
Availability: Free Download
Format: Acrobat
Core
assumptions that underpin the model
Availability: Free Download
Format: Acrobat

Your
region, your nature Make
the links - benefit from your biodiversity.
Natural
Regions
- the infinite value of biodiversity. Every
region
has its
own regional biodiversity partnership or
forum. Why
not work
together with your regional biodiversity
service to help meet the challenge of
building
a sustainable future for your area?

Natural
Partners - a report
from the England Biodiversity
Group, celebrates
the achievements of Local Biodiversity
Partnerships. The report
highlights
the benefits of local action
for biodiversity (the rich
variety of life) and how
it benefits people, as well
as wildlife.
Over 100 local partnerships have been
formed throughout England and involve
a broad range of partners; from local
authorities, conservation agencies
and charities, to landowners, educational
institutes and businesses. A wide
variety of volunteers and community
groups are also engaged in putting
the plans into action and 'Natural
Partners' highlights local success
stories.
Author: England Biodiversity Group
Publisher: The Wildlife Trusts on behalf
of the England Biodiversity Group
ISBN: 0902484 931
Availability: Free Download
Format: Acrobat
 Millennium Biodiversity
Report (MBR) - Sustaining the
variety of life: 5 years of the UK
Biodiversity
Action Plan.
Author: UK Biodiversity Group
Publisher: DETR
ISBN:
Availability: Free Download
Format: Acrobat
Part
1 (625K)
Part
2 (553K)
Part
3 (651K)
Part
4 (962K)
Part
5 (1043K)
Part
6 (727K)
Part
7 (92K)
Cover
(134K)
 Delivering Biodiversity
Through Community Strategies - Local
Biodiversity Action Plans must underpin
Community Strategies to ensure that local
authorities consider biodiversity central
to all decision and policy making. Many
LBAP Partnerships find it difficult to engage
in the Community Strategies process. Evidence
shows that across England and Wales some
groups are significantly influencing the
priorities and therefore the action, targets
and indicators in Community Strategies.
Our aim is to share this information with
the biodiversity community, encouraging
and supporting further involvement across
both countries.
Format: Acrobat
Case Study 1 - Cardiff
Case Study 2 - Herefordshire
Case Study 3 - Nottinghamshire
Case Study 4 - Cheshire
Case Study 5 - Staffordshire
Case Study 6 - Kent
|
|