| Action Plan Progress» |
Links Between Lead Partners and Local Biodiversity
Action Plans |
LINKS BETWEEN LEAD PARTNERS AND LOCAL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLANS
| Overview
of links between Lead Partners and Local Biodiversity Action Plans |
- 257 (66%) UK BAP species and 41 (91%) UK BAP habitats are included
in at least one Local Biodiversity Action Plan.
- Local Biodiversity Partnerships have also prepared action plans for
a large number of species and habitats that have local significance
and resonance. Many of these are also species of conservation concern
nationally.
- Although 83% of Lead Partners believed Local Biodiversity Action Plans
were at least slightly important in achieving the UK plan targets, 60% of all
Lead Partners reported little or no contact with them.
- 38 Local Biodiversity Action Plans reported being involved
in collaborative projects with Lead Partners.
|
The UK BAP is implemented by national steering groups (coordinated
by lead partners) and by local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) partnerships.
Local Biodiversity Action Plans exist to help achieve the targets for UK BAP
priority species and habitats and to identify and deliver targets for locally
distinct wildlife. They also play a major part in raising awareness of the need
for conservation among the general public, educational establishments and the
private sector, which is critical if the UK BAP process is to be sustainable.
Local conservation action, engagement in public awareness,
education and developing partnerships are vital actions that form a major part
of the work of Local Biodiversity Action Plans and form an essential complement
to the UK action plans. Local Biodiversity Action Plans are often organised
at the county or unitary authority level, although they also exist for national
parks and for other administrative areas such as districts.
| Question posed to LBAP Coordinators: |
| |
Please confirm the species and habitats (both UK BAP
and local priorities) for which your LBAP has produced plans. |
| |
| Responses to this question were received for
123 (76%) Local Biodiversity Action Plans. |
- Local Biodiversity Action Plans have produced over 2500 action plans for
habitats and species.
- 257 (66%) UK BAP priority species and 41 (91%) UK BAP priority habitats
are included in at least one Local Biodiversity Action Plan.
- A higher proportion of UK BAP priority vertebrates and vascular plants are
covered by Local Biodiversity Action Plans than insects and lower plants (Figure
1). Many of the priority species in these latter taxa are not well suited
to Local Biodiversity Action Plan action because they are highly restricted
in range, are pelagic marine species or require specialist conservation measures.
Click here for more details.
- Local Biodiversity Partnerships have also prepared action plans for over
1200 species and habitats that have local significance and resonance. Many
of these are also species of conservation concern at a national or UK level,
such as the chough, tawny owl, Atlantic salmon, black poplar and bog orchid.
| Figure 1: UK BAP priority habitats and
species also included in LocalBiodiversity Action Plans. |
| Question posed to Lead Partners: |
| |
a) Which of the following most accurately
describes your interaction with Local Biodiversity Action Plans, up to
now? (Select from drop-down list)
b) If you have been in contact with Local Biodiversity Action
Plans how was it initiated?
c) Irrespctive of current contact, how important do you consider
Local Biodiversity Action Plan co-ordinated action will be in achieving
the targets of the plan?
d) If you consider Local Biodiversity Action Plan action to
be anything other than unimportant, which of the following forms of engagement
do you think would be appropriate? (Select from categories). |
| |
| Responses to this question were received for
44 (98%) habitats and 364 (93%) species. |
| Question posed to Local Biodiversity
Action Plan partnerships: |
| |
a) Which of the following types of interaction
have you had with Lead Partners/Agencies up to now? (Select from categories)
b) Please select the type of contact you have had for each
UK priority HAP or SAP for which your Local Biodiversity Action Plan has
plans, indicate who initiated contact and whether (in your opinion) future
contact with the Lead Partner/Agency would be desirable if targets are
to be achieved. |
| |
| Responses to this question were received for
118 (73%) Local Biodiversity Action Plans. |
UK and Local Biodiversity Action Plans share
common goals but often work independently of each other. A major challenge for
the UK BAP process is to improve the integration between these levels of implementation.
Beginning to meet this challenge was a major aim of the 2002 reporting round.
As a consequence of data received during the reporting round, information has
been sent to all Lead Partners and Local Biodiversity Action Plan officers,
raising awareness of relevant action and exchanging contact information where
it was flagged as desirable.
- 83% of Lead Partners felt that Local Biodiversity Action Plans were at least slightly important
in delivering their targets (3% critical, 40% important, 40% slightly important and 17%
unimportant). Figure 2 shows the breakdown for species and habitats and it is noticeable that
in general Lead Partners for habitats felt Local Biodiversity Action Plans were more important in delivering their
targets than those for species.
- The 64 (17%) Lead Partners that considered Local Biodiversity Action Plans unimportant
for attaining UK targets were in most cases leads for marine species
or species with highly restricted ranges. Click
here for more information
- Although over 80% of Lead Partners believed Local Biodiversity Action Plans
have at least a slightly important role in achieving the UK BAP targets, 60% of all Lead Partners
reported little or no contact with the Local Biodiversity Action Plan officers (Figure 3)
.
- In three cases where Lead Partners believed Local Biodiversity Action Plans
to be critical for the delivery of plan targets, there had been little or
no contact. These were the plans for coastal saltmarsh, mudflats and the diving
beetle Bidessus minutissimus. As a result of this reporting round, relevant
contact information has now been exchanged with these groups.
| Figure 2: Lead Partners' views of how important
Local Biodiversity Action Plans are in achieving the UK BAP targets. |
| Figure 3: The level of contact that Lead
Partners have had with Local Biodiversity Action Plans. |
In most cases there has been little or no bilateral contact between Local Biodiversity Action Plans and Lead Partners. Given the amount of work involved to achieve close working between every Local Biodiversity Action Plan and every relevant Lead Partner, this is perhaps not surprising. There is, however, a clear need to improve integration of Local Biodiversity Action Plan and Lead Partner work, for example, through using new technologies. Nonetheless, there have been some impressive examples of collaboration. The results below were the responses of Local Biodiversity Action Plan officers when they were asked what level of contact had occurred with any Lead Partners.
- Where contact had occurred, it was most commonly indirect. However, 75 officers (64% of those responding to the question) reported having had direct contact with at least one Lead Partner (either through direct advice, reciprocal attendance at meetings, or collaborative projects). See Figure 4.
- 20 Local Biodiversity Action Plans (17% of those responding to the question)
are involved in collaborative projects with at least one Lead Partner. Examples
include the Bedfordshire and Luton LBAP partnership, which has been working
with the Lead Partner to restore their lowland calcareous grassland resource,
and the Bioamrywiaeth yn Eryri partnership in Snowdonia National Park where
the local partnership is developing collaborative projects with Lead Partners
to conserve water voles, otters and great-crested newts.
| N.B. There are currently no drill downs on this figure |
| Figure 4: Types of contact that Local Biodiversity
Action Plans have had with Lead Partners. (More) |